• Karnavati University Garba Mahotsav. Click here to Book Now
  • UID Admissions 2024-25 Application Window Open CLICK HERE to Apply Call 9266663225 to know more.
  • KU Admissions FEE Payment Click Here
  • Karnavati University invites applications for teaching positions Click here for details

KUAT 2022-23 Admissions Open Now! Click here to apply +91 9667048555

Announcement Admission

Article 15 (5) and Social Justice in Privatised Higher Education

July 1, 2020

Article 15(5) under which special provision can be made for the representation of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs) in privatized higher education, is only an enabling provision which means that the issue of representation of SEBCs as students & staff (both academic & administrative) in private higher education is now dependent upon the sweet will of Legislature & the Executive of each State. Even where the political will could be mustered to implement the mandate of Article 15(5) the judicial hurdles continue to surmount. For example, the State Legislature of Uttar Pradesh passed the Admission o Educational Institutions (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 2006 in order to override the decision in Inamdar by making provision of reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other SEBCs, in admission to educational institutions, including private educational institutions. But the Allahabad High Court prevented the enforcement of this Act on one pretext of the other and finally gave a fatal blow to it by declaring the key provisions of the Act unconstitutional in 2011. Hence, the judicial policy of postponement of social justice continues deep into private higher education.

Moreover, the exemption by Article 15(5) to minority educational institutions referred to in Clause (1) of Article 30 has suppressed the question of representation of SEBCs belonging to minority communities popularly known as “Pasmanda” in private higher education. On this question public & private higher education look like mirror images of each other. This is one of those classical examples where both the Parliament & the judiciary come together to pursue a policy of denial of representation to SEBCs at all spaces which can be termed as higher.

Author:
Dr. Ayaz Ahmad, Associate Professor, Unitedworld School of Law (UWSL)

Disclaimer: The opinions / views expressed in this article are solely of the author in his / her individual capacity. They do not purport to reflect the opinions and/or views of the College and/or University or its members.

Related Blogs

Machine Intelligence vs Human Intelligence
June 21, 2022

I want to share an incident which has happened recently & related to the finance market. A well-known company has sanctioned a credit line of Rs One Lakh to the customer & out of this that customer has utilised around Rs Twenty Thousand. So Rs Eighty Thousand is still unused. But the account got blocked […]

Read More
Product Standardization
June 21, 2022

Companies marketing their products in international market are faced with the decision of whether to standardize their product or adapt their product offerings. Product standardization means marketing a product in international market with some or little changes except for some cosmetic changes such as modifying labeling and packaging as per the countries regulation. The products […]

Read More
Choosing a Financial Product for Investment
June 21, 2022

When it comes to choosing a financial product for Investment, most of the investors rely on random tips they received from friends or relatives rather than analysis. Needless to say that this will result in financial losses later on. It is very important to adopt due diligence while choosing a financial product and the checklist […]

Read More
icon