• KUAT (Karnavati University Admission Test) 2023 to be held on - 4th June, 2023 (Sunday)- Admissions Open. Click Here to Apply- Call +91 96670 48555
  • UID Admissions 2023-24- NRI/NRI Sponsored/ Management/ Foreign candidates application window open CLICK HERE to Apply.
  • UID 2023-24 Lateral Entry Admission from 2nd Year( 3rd Sem. ) is open CLICK HERE to Download the Form.
  • UID Admissions 2023-24 General Category Candidates Click Here login to your UID Application Account for further update.
  • B.Tech 2023 Admissions Open. Click Here to Apply- Call +91 7574811135
  • KU Admissions FEE Payment Click Here
  • Karnavati University invites applications for teaching positions Click here for details

KUAT 2022-23 Admissions Open Now! Click here to apply +91 9667048555

Announcement Admission

Forward Reservation: An Ubiquitous Hole Or Limited Compassion

March 4, 2020

Reservation has been imbibed in the spirit of public policies towards the socially underprivileged in India. Indian legal situation is quota-centric in terms of governmental jobs and educational institutions. Reservation is essentially considered as prejudiced with regard to a meritorious candidate as they get disadvantage over a low merited candidate. The 103rd Amendment Act of the Constitution provides an additional 10% reservation for the “Economically Weaker Section” (EWS) of the society in jobs as well as educational institutions. Reservation in the era of independence was intended to attain the eventual goal of development, although it has resulted in further disintegration of the society on caste basis rather than on class basis which was never the goal. The 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act has actually brought a new revolution in the reservation system and its objective is indeed a remarkable move but its execution has not been appropriate. Reservation on the basis of economic criteria is indeed a viable effort to provide an equal opportunity but instead of disturbing the existing reservation scheme it would be more feasible to adjust the 10% reservation by reducing the existing reservation. The criteria provided for compartmentalization of “EWS” is not an appropriate yardstick as it varies according to the standard of living and other associated factors. The flaw found in the factor for categorizing the “EWS” and insertion of 10% reservation beyond 50% index has created a rift in the meritocratic society and somehow established mediocrity over meritocracy

Prof. Aparna Singh, Assistant Professor, Unitedworld School of Law (UWSL)

Disclaimer: The opinions / views expressed in this article are solely of the author in his / her individual capacity. They do not purport to reflect the opinions and/or views of the College and/or University or its members.

Related Blogs

June 21, 2022
Machine Intelligence vs Human Intelligence

I want to share an incident which has happened recently & related to the finance market. A well-known company has sanctioned a credit line of Rs One Lakh to the customer & out of this that customer has utilised around Rs Twenty Thousand. So Rs Eighty Thousand is still unused. But the account got blocked […]

Read More
June 21, 2022
Product Standardization

Companies marketing their products in international market are faced with the decision of whether to standardize their product or adapt their product offerings. Product standardization means marketing a product in international market with some or little changes except for some cosmetic changes such as modifying labeling and packaging as per the countries regulation. The products […]

Read More
June 21, 2022
Choosing a Financial Product for Investment

When it comes to choosing a financial product for Investment, most of the investors rely on random tips they received from friends or relatives rather than analysis. Needless to say that this will result in financial losses later on. It is very important to adopt due diligence while choosing a financial product and the checklist […]

Read More